India Revokes Transshipment Facility After Remark of Yunus on Northeast

New Delhi Responds to Dhaka’s China Tilt

India has revoked the transshipment facility for Bangladeshi exports to third countries through its ports. This decision came days after Bangladesh’s interim Chief Adviser, Muhammad Yunus, made a significant claim. He stated that Dhaka is the “only guardian of the ocean” for landlocked Northeast India. His comments during a recent visit to China were seen as asserting Bangladesh’s strategic leverage in the region.

MEA Cites Congestion, Export Delays

The Ministry of External Affairs cited logistical congestion as a reason for the move. Rising costs at Indian ports and airports were also mentioned. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal clarified that this will not affect Bangladesh’s cargo to Nepal or Bhutan.

Long-standing Demand from Indian Exporters

The Apparel Export Promotion Council welcomed the decision, calling it a long-standing demand. It said the move would lower freight costs and ease congestion for Indian exporters.

Yunus’s Statement Sparks Diplomatic Tension

During his March visit to China, Yunus highlighted Bangladesh’s strategic importance for the landlocked northeastern states of India. He suggested the region could be integrated with China’s economy through Bangladesh. His remarks were viewed as provocative in Delhi and prompted a sharp response from Indian officials.

Strategic Concerns Around China’s Growing Role

Analysts suggest the move may also be linked to Bangladesh’s growing defense ties with China. Infrastructure connections include plans to develop the Lalmonirhat airbase. This area is near India’s sensitive Siliguri Corridor or “Chicken Neck” area.

Reaction from Northeast Leaders

Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma called Yunus’s remarks “offensive,” warning against the “vulnerability narrative” tied to the corridor. He advocated for improving internal connectivity to reduce reliance on foreign routes.

WTO Implications

Experts warn the decision may raise questions under WTO rules. These rules mandate free transit for goods to and from landlocked nations. While India argues this is a logistical measure, legal scrutiny may follow.